Digestive System
Online Learning Platform

This is a case of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile colitis with typical pseudomembranes on the colonic mucosa.  Elderly and nursing home patients are risk factors. We should take biopsies and ask for faecal sample (GDH and /or culture for toxigenic C.diff) because pseudomembrane rarely can have other causes (Staphylococcus aureus, CMV, radiation, ischemic, chemotherapy)

Patient does not meet the definition of Severe (>15000 leucocytes or deranged Creatinin) or fulminant (hypotension, septic shock, megacolon)

Most guidelines no longer recommend Metronidazole for C.diff as first line unless no other alternative available.  Despite ACG recommends either Vancomycin or Fidaxomicin as first line, (Fidaxomicin is more expensive) the European guidelines recommend Fidaxomicin over Vancomycin (Vancomycin is a perfect acceptable good choice , however despite both curing the infection in about the same rates (76.2% vs 70.5%),  lower recurrence rates with fidaxomicin are described (8.3% vs 32.6%) which could justify its higher cost.

Kudo II (asteroid or stellate pits) which are star or cross-shaped.  This is very typical of hyperplastic polyps (non neoplastic)  or serrated lesions.

This image  impedance pH study showing a proximal then distal increase in impedance with air clearing from the esophagus orally. Arrows indicate direction of air flow down and then up. This is supragastric Belching. (B) High-resolution manometry showing repetitive supragastic belching with upper esophageal sphincter opening then air propagating through the esophagus, contraction of diaphragm with aborad (away from the mouth) movement of lower esophageal sphincter.   The treatment for this is behavioural therapy and adding central neuromodulators in cases of linked psychological disorders

Calcium channel inhibitors and other antispasmodic therapy has been used for spastic disorders such as diffuse oesophageal spasm and nutcracker (hypercontractile) oesophagus.

POEM and Hellers myotomy are well known treatments for Achalasia.

EGJOO(Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction )  can respond well to balloon dilation or botox (63-70%, although POEM is not commonly used it has been described very effective)

This is likely a lower GI bleed, however, the fact that is so abrupt and has caused   haemorrhagic shock makes us wonder if he is not having a severe upper GI bleed – frail patient taking clopidogrel - Severe upper GI bleed sometimes can be so brisk and profuse that blood travels the intestine fast wihtout being digested, so patient passes per rectum red bright blood instead of black melaena. (Blood is laxative too) As many as 10–15% of patients suspected initially to have lower GI bleed are ultimately found to have an UGI source.

Once OGD is done and clear, the next step should be depending on the clinical and hemodinamic status. Either prepare the patient for colonoscopy/ video capsule (If clinically stable)  or repeat CT angio (If clinically worse)-->If bleeding point is located and there is no access to IR (interventional radiology) the surgeons may want to proceed with exploration and colectomy but this is the last resource as obviously this is an elderly patient with cardiovascular factors (Clopidogrel) whose surgery would be high risk of mortality and morbidity.

In grade C-D reflux oesophagitis we should initiate PPI longlife (or increase the dose if patient already taking) and repeat endoscopy in 6-8 weeks to confirm healing and rule out underlying Barrett's (British recommend 6 weeks, american recommend 8weeks)

Biopsies, however, are controversial. ASGE  recommends bx  of irregular or deep oesophageal ulcerations or nodularity. ESGE does not mention them, whereas BSG recommends taking samples of any oesophageal ulcer or severe grade D oesophagitis.

Is the opinion of the author that any suspicious ulcer (despite of the grade of esophagitis) should be biopsied in the moment, whereas in  typical grade D oesophagitis biopsies might have a low diagnostic yield, atypia is difficult to assess due acute inflammation, and samples will be best targeted after improvement of the inflammation.

According to the  2020 BSG  post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines   we recommend no surveillance if life expectancy is less than 10 y or patient older than 75 yo.  However this can be flexible depending on the patient situation. For example, if histology show incomplete resection margins or colonoscopy was suboptimally prepared then it could be reasonable to repeat the test in 1 year.

If this same case was in a fit and younger patient (e.g  65 yo patient ) then given that we removed 5  adenomas (premalignant) - this would be the cutoff to have another colonoscopy in 3 years

In fact, the majority of the guidelines suggest 3 year follow up if 5 or more small(<10mm)  adenomas are removed.  2020 AGA recommend 3 years followup if 5-10 adenomas, 5 years if 3-4 adenomas and up to 7-10 years if only 1-2 adenomas (or SSL).

For example, if a 65 yo patient had only 4 small adenomas with en bloc resection and good bowel cleaning,  no further surveillance and return to bowel screening according to the British guidelines but would need 5 year colonoscopy according to the AGA guidelines. 

Check the guidelines

both Left main bronchus and left atrium are compressions   visualized anterior to the oesophagus. See image